Tracey Emin bites back (2008) (book proposal)
Page 2 of 2
Tracey Emin bites back (2008) book proposal: 1 | 2
-
Reference image for book proposal Tracey Emin bites back (2008) by R.J. Preece, who was informed c. 2001 that the artist hated this exhibition review: Tracey Emin at Lehmann-Maupin (1999).
3. Q&A of Tracey Emin by R.J. Preece, providing an overview of Tracey’s thoughts on the selected texts
- I propose a Q&A that would be done after Tracey reviews and comments on the press clippings. The purpose would be to bring Tracey directly into previewing the selected articles that are examined, disputed, etc. By doing this after Tracey makes the text comments, the examples will be fresher in her mind.
4. A selection of revisited writings: 30-50 (depending on length; RP proposes that the number of pages be determined by Tracey’s needs for "setting the record straight" in relation to publisher needs)
- In order to show that I support the artist-led revision process in itself, and it’s not me pretending to be a “good journo” versus “bad or sloppy journos”, maybe my 1999 review of her show at Lehmann Maupin could start this off. I recall that [Tracey] did not like it. However, I’d probably want to frame the book page(s)… other writers / publication staff might too…
E. Proposed innovative text presentation
RP proposes a written-over reprint, crossed out, scribbled with notes text presentation somewhat comparable to Tracey’s review copy of the Thames and Hudson book.
- Why? Because it’s rough, it’s real, it’s interactive, and it aims to take away the authority of the perfect-looking presented text which we all know is at times highly misleading, as with the selected reprints. It exposes a discussion / reaction that is not usually for public view.
1. Perhaps a page with a list of any reprint refusals
For example, Newsnight mentions which people, companies, and government agencies refuse to comment to expose this kind of media-shaping position. I propose that this list be given to readers, followed by comments by Tracey expressing concern about the text, and the stated reason for the writer / publication’s refusal. This then helps to get the information, or doubt, out there, but also works practically within the publishing system. The concept does intend to be respectful to all, but also peel back the layer of media dynamics to show the truth of the process.
2. A 1-2 page list of the essay and articles that Tracey particularly likes and feels that most represents her work, practice and life
- Perhaps quotes are added afterwards that explain why Tracey approves of these texts. With this addition, Tracey’s intention then is hopefully nailed down for the public.
[End proposal]
Tracey Emin bites back (2008) book proposal: 1 | 2
ads by artdesigncafe
Facebook comments
